Yes - why not both? Good letter now, more legalistic response soon. Becoming obvious that getting TrailCo to the WV line is critical to the whole proposal.

Jim Sconyers jim_scon@yahoo.com 603.969.6712

Remember: Mother Nature bats last.

----- Original Message ---- From: James Kotcon jkotcon@wvu.edu To: ec@osenergy.org Sent: Friday, September 12, 2008 12:28:43 PM Subject: [EC] Fw: Allegheny Energy Files Proposal on Pennsylvania Transmission Project

Bill, et al.

I think we should file a response in PA to let them know that we oppose TrAILCo and their proposed approval of the 1.2-mile segment between the 502 Junction and the WV State Line. We have filed appeals of the WV certificate approval, and a premature approval of the PA segment would bias consideration of our appeals. Further, it would be useful to fully document TrAILCo's behind-the-scenes negotiations and tactics, and their efforts to cut some opponents out of the process, while buying off others with legalized bribes (using ratepayers money to do it), as happened here. I can draft a letter to that effect, if you think it is useful. Alternatively, a formal legal response might be more appropriate.

Whaddya Tink?

JBK

...

...

Letty Butcher multiflora123@yahoo.com 9/11/2008 9:20 AM >>>

--- On Wed, 9/10/08, Wojtowicz, Ralph wojtowicz@metsci.com wrote:

From: Wojtowicz, Ralph wojtowicz@metsci.com Subject: Allegheny Energy Files Proposal on Pennsylvania Transmission Project To: "Wojtowicz, Ralph" wojtowicz@metsci.com, cesunlight@earthlink.net, multiflora123@yahoo.com, roecalvert@hughes.net, michael@troutdesign.com, billgolemon@frontiernet.net, bgkessinger@comcast.net, kward@wvgazette.com, news@hampshirereview.com, news@moorefieldexaminer.com, news@grantcountypress.com, WVBiker98@aol.com Cc: mpisciotta@citynet.net, bwest@pecva.org, thomas@theshepherdstownobserver.com, cesunlight@earthlink.net, news@morganmessenger.com, news@dominionpost.com, newsroom@therepublicannes.com Date: Wednesday, September 10, 2008, 7:45 PM

Please forward.

Allegheny Energy Files Proposal on Pennsylvania Transmission Project

GREENSBURG, Pa.--(BUSINESS WIRE)--Sept. 10, 2008--Allegheny Energy, Inc. (NYSE:AYE) announced today that its Trans-Allegheny Interstate Line Company (TrAILCo) subsidiary filed a motion with the Pennsylvania Public Utility Commission to defer any decision on a portion of its proposed transmission line project, the Trans-Allegheny Interstate Line.

The request will allow the company to pursue a more collaborative process to explore whether there are new and creative alternatives to the proposed 36-mile portion of the 500 kilovolt line in Greene and Washington counties and related facilities.

The company's motion also requests that the Commission timely approve a 1.2 mile section of 500 kilovolt line extending from the West Virginia border to a new substation in Greene County, Pennsylvania known as 502 Junction. This portion of the project addresses critical reliability concerns that could adversely impact the mid-Atlantic region, including Pennsylvania electric customers, as early as 2011.

The motion is intended to be considered in conjunction with exceptions filed today by TrAILCo in response to two Administrative Law Judges' recent recommendation that the company's application be denied in Pennsylvania. In its exceptions, TrAILCo also explicitly asks the Commission to reverse the recommended decision of the Judges and approve the 1.2 mile segment between the West Virginia state line and 502 Junction.

_______________________________________________ EC mailing list EC@osenergy.org http://osenergy.org/mailman/listinfo/ec