CLEAR August 2009

clear@lists.cheatlakeclear.org

1 participants
2 discussions

EPA Clean Water program
by duane330＠aol.com 24 Aug '09

24 Aug '09

EPA SEEKS PUBLIC INPUT ON CLEAN WATER ENFORCEMENT ACTION PLAN THROUGH ONLINE FORUM EPA is inviting the public to participate in its online forum through its new Web site with ideas about the future direction EPA should take to more effectively enforce Clean Water requirements and achieve better compliance.? EPA wants to know what direction its national water enforcement program should take to improve water quality protection in the nation and enforce outstanding violations.? The Clean Water Enforcement Action Plan discussion forum which will close on Friday, Aug. 28 will accept this input, and evaluate and consider recommendations to the EPA Administrator about what the public feels the future direction of EPA's water enforcement program should take. We are providing information to assist the public discussions: Clean Water Enforcement Action Plan, state-by-state reports: Assessing the effectiveness of the program, EPA and state enforcement data, and the administrator's memorandum: The Memorandum.

1 0

Mon River runs high TDS
by Duane330＠aol.com 20 Aug '09

20 Aug '09

Pa. going over W.Va.’s head on Mon River pollution by Ken Ward Jr., The Charleston Gazette Our neighbors to the north are apparently growing tired of West Virginia’s inaction — or _action through only baby steps_ (http://www.wvgazette.com/News/200907150773) — to deal with the potential water pollution problems from disposal of “pit fluids” from large-scale oil and gas drilling. According to _a story over the weekend_ (http://www.post-gazette.com/pg/09229/991367-455.stm) by Pittsburgh Post-Gazette reporter Don Hopey, Pennsylvania authorities have asked the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency to step in and set tougher pollution limits for Monongahela River. Pennsylvania DEP Secretary John Hanger told Hopey that his state has issued orders limiting the discharges of total dissolved solids, or TDS, in the Mon — and, perhaps more importantly, has started the lengthy process of drafting new regulatory controls. But, Hanger said, West Virginia hasn’t done likewise. Hanger told Hopey: We’re not satisfied with the response we’ve received from West Virginia and are engaging the EPA. Because at the end of the day, without federal involvement, we may not get the kind of cooperation needed to solve this problem. I personally have concerns that the posture of West Virginia on this matter is not aggressive enough. In his article, Hopey explained some background of this Pa-W.Va. dispute: Sources of dissolved solids include sewage treatment plants, power plant scrubber and coolant water, storm water runoff, abandoned mine drainage, a host of industrial activities and wastewater from oil and gas drilling, especially the millions of gallons produced by deep wells tapping into the Marcellus shale gas bed. For the past year, Pennsylvania has restricted the amount of wastewater from those deep gas drilling operations that sewage treatment plants can accept to no more than 1 percent of their total water discharges into the river. West Virginia has only recently urged treatment facilities to limit intake of well waste water. And officials there said the sewage treatment plant in Clarksburg, the only such facility in the state that was permitted to accept well drilling waste water, stopped last month. Scott Mandirola, director of the WVDEP’s Division of Water and Waste Management, told Hopey that his agency would “cooperate fully” with Pennsylvania and the EPA to develop a pollution reduction plan for the Mon. But as I reported in May, setting the needed pollution limits _is not a major priority for WVDEP_ (http://www.wvgazette.com/News/200905180578) . In _a presentation_ (http://www.wvdep.org/Docs/17155_tds.pdf) during a public water quality standards meeting, DEP assistant water director Pat Campbell noted that surrounding states have such standards, but West Virginia is only just beginning to study whether it should adopt one: This is the beginning of the state considering whether to have a TDS critiera and what that number should be. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> See also: _http://waterdata.usgs.gov/usa/nwis/uv?site_no=03075070_ (http://waterdata.usgs.gov/usa/nwis/uv?site_no=03075070) Note: The total dissolved solids (TDS) level will be approximately two-thirds the value of the specific conductivity, measured in microsiemens (formerly known as micro-mhos, created from ohms spelled backward, because it is a conductivity rather than a resistance. See also: _www.uppermon.org_ (http://www.uppermon.org)

1 0

2025

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

2005

CLEAR August 2009