In a recent Science magazine article (Science, Vol. 311, p. 27), it is pointed out that in order for significant health improvements to be achieved greater cuts are needed. 

 

An outside panel of scientists suggested greater reductions to the EPA, but they did not follow that advice.  Here are some facts from that article:

(1.) PM 2.5 particles in air, which result from soot from combustion processes, harms health in several ways.  It can trigger asthma attacks, and kill individuals suffering from heart and lung disease. 

 

(2.) The American Lung Association sued the EPA to reduce these emission particles by the end of 2005.  The new standards lower PM 2.5 from 65  to 325 micrograms/cubic meter.   This is just under the range recommended by the Clean Air Scientific Advisory Committee.

 

(3.) The EPA has studied 9 model cities and showed that a reduction to 15 micrograms/cubic meter would lower PM 2.5 caused deaths by 48%, while the recommended change would reduce the death rate by only 22%. 

 

There are three public meetings planned and the Science article said that the EPA will accept public comments until April. 

 

You can find information on the American Lung Association,

on who to write to.....

they have a letter formatted or you can do your own. 

 

 

Larry (Aka Participant 13)

 

Larry Harris
637 Grand Street
Morgantown, WV 26501
304-296-4954 (H)
304-293-7749 (W)
clharris@hsc.wvu.edu